Accessibility statement
Assessed on 31 July 2026
TAMIS is committed to making its website usable by everyone. This page states how far we are, measured against a public reference framework, and says plainly what is not yet met. Every figure below is computed from files kept in the source repository, not typed into this page.
Conformity status
100 %
This site is fully compliant with RGAA 4.1: 72 of 72 applicable criteria met, 35 not applicable to this service.
Non-applicable criteria are excluded from the denominator, as the method requires. A criterion awaiting an organisational decision counts as not met: until the decision is taken, it is not held, and rounding the other way would inflate the rate with a promise.
The reference framework
We use the RGAA 4.1, the French accessibility framework for digital services, aligned with WCAG 2.1 level AA. The assessment is a self-assessment: no external audit was carried out for this release, and saying so matters as much as the rate itself.
Scope
The public site, in both themes. The back-office is deliberately excluded: it is built on a third-party administration framework whose CSS and JavaScript we do not control, and it is used by a small number of people from the TAMIS consortium to publish content. Including it would make a public rate depend on choices that are not ours, for a service visitors never see.
Pages tested
The framework asks for a representative sample, not an exhaustive one. These pages were chosen to cover each template rather than each page: two pages built from the same template share their defects.
- /
- /use-cases
- /use-cases/asset-marketplace
- /resources/glossary
- /news
- /news/{slug}
- /contact
- /services
- /how-to-join
- /search?q=metadata
- /une-adresse-qui-nexiste-pas
Technologies and methods
The site is built with HTML, CSS, JavaScript (Alpine.js) and SVG.
Assessment combined manual inspection of the rendered markup, full keyboard navigation, programmatic contrast checks run by the test suite, validation of heading structure and ARIA attributes, and screen reader checks on the interactive components. No automated tool was used on its own: they catch a missing attribute, never a wrong one, and never an absurd tab order.
What is in place
- No information depends on colour alone: metadata families are told apart by line, shape and word, and maturity levels are spelled out.
- Every interactive component is reachable and operable with the keyboard, with a visible focus indicator in both themes.
- Tooltips open on hover and on focus, close with Escape, and are never the only route to the meaning: the term is also a link to the full entry.
- Animations stop when they leave the screen or the tab goes to the background, and never start at all if your system asks for reduced motion.
- The lifecycle diagram is an ordered list of real text, not an image with a caption: a screen reader gets the same content as the eye.
- Landmarks and a single, unbroken heading hierarchy on every page.
- Content stays readable with CSS disabled, at 200% zoom, and at a 320-pixel viewport without two-dimensional scrolling.
- Form fields carry labels, required fields are marked, and errors are described in words with a way to fix them.
What is not met yet
Nothing, on the sample assessed. That is a result on eleven page templates, not a claim about every page: this is a self-assessment, and no external audit was carried out.
Action plan
No gap remains on the sample assessed. The next assessment will widen the sample rather than repeat this one.
Telling us we are wrong
If you cannot reach something on this site, tell us. A description of what you were trying to do, and how, is more useful than a technical report. The contact form arrives with the subject already set.
Report an accessibility barrierUnder French law, if no reply comes, the matter may be referred to the Défenseur des droits. TAMIS does not yet exist as a legal entity, so the party responsible for this statement and the formal route of appeal are not yet designated. We say so rather than leave the line blank.